Scot Pinkerton v. E Valenzuela

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING 21 Motion to Stay in Light of Pending Appellate Decision, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/14. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 1:13-cv-01283 AWI MJS HC SCOT ERIC PINKERTON, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY IN Petitioner, LIGHT OF PENDING APPELLATE DECISION v. 13 (Doc. 21.) 14 15 E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. Petitioner filed the petition on July 8, 2013 challenging a 1999 20 conviction. Because Petitioner had previously sought habeas corpus review from this 21 Court regarding this conviction, the Court dismissed the petition as successive on 22 November 15, 2013. Petitioner is currently appealing the resulting judgment. 23 January 7, 2014 he filed a motion to stay the present matter during the pendency of the 24 appeal. (ECF No. 21.) 25 On The present action has been dismissed, and the case is closed. As the case is not 26 pending, the motion to stay the action is DENIED as moot. Should the Ninth Circuit 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 authorize Petitioner to file a second or successive petition, Petitioner may then move this 2 Court to re-open the present matter. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?