St. Clair v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleadings; ORDER - defendant JP Morgan Chase bank, N.A. response to Plaintiff's complaint must be filed by 11/4/2013. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/7/2013. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JOHN COX, CASB No. 197687 john.cox@kyl.com JESSICA LUHRS, CASB No. 284846 jessica.luhrs@kyl.com KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN A Professional Corporation 450 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94133 Telephone: (415) 398-6000 Facsimile: (415) 981-0136 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ST. CLAIR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:13-CV-01317-AWI-BAM STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; ORDER Barbara A. McAuliffe U.S. Magistrate Judge 17 Plaintiff RICHARD ST. CLAIR (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendant 18 19 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A (“Defendant”), on the other hand, through their respective 20 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 21 WHEREAS, on August 20, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant action in this Court; 22 WHEREAS, on August 22, 2013, Plaintiff served Defendant with the Complaint; 23 WHEREAS, Defendant substituted new counsel concurrently with the filing of this 24 25 26 stipulation; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant previously stipulated and agreed to extend Defendant’s due date for the filing of a responsive pleading to October 3, 2013; 27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant are currently conducting further investigation of 28 this matter to determine if a potential early resolution of this matter outside of Court is possible; and -1- 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have now agreed and stipulated that Defendant 2 may have a thirty (30) day extension of time to November 4, 2013 to file its response to the 3 Complaint. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 5 Defendant’s response to the Complaint shall be filed and served on or before 6 November 4, 2013. 7 8 9 DATED: October 3, 2013 10 11 _______________________________________ JOHN COX JESSICA LUHRS KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN Attorneys for Defendant JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 12 13 14 DATED: October 2, 2013 15 16 17 /s/ Charles T. Marshall (as authorized on October 2, 2013) _______________________________________ CHARLES T. MARSHALL LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES T. MARSHALL Attorney for Plaintiff RICHARD ST. CLAIR 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 ORDER 2 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and the Court’s authority, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 4 that Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., must file its response to Plaintiff’s 5 Complaint no later than November 4, 2013. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara October 7, 2013 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?