St. Clair v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
23
ORDER on Stipulation and Resetting Matter to January 24, 2014, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/25/13. Motion Hearing set for 1/24/2013 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RICHARD ST. CLAIR,
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15
16
17
18
19
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND
U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR
WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
WMALT SERIES 2007-OA3
20
21
22
23
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:13- cv-1317-AWI-BAM
ORDER ON STIPULATION AND
RESETTING MATTER TO JANUARY 24,
2014
24
25
26
27
28
On October 3, 2013, MERS and U.S. Bank filed a motion to dismiss, and hearing was set
for December 16, 2013. On November 4, 2013, JP Morgan Chase filed a motion to dismiss, and
hearing was set for January 24, 2014. On November 25, 2013, Plaintiffs and MERS and U.S.
1
2
Bank filed a stipulation to move the hearing on their motion to dismiss to December 30, 2013.
The Stipulation also included a briefing schedule for an opposition and a reply.
3
After considering the stipulation and the pending motions, the Court will give partial effect
4
5
to MERS and U.S. Bank’s request. The Court will vacate the December 16, 2014 hearing and
6
reset the matter to January 24, 2014, so that both pending motions to dismiss will be heard on the
7
same day. The opposition and reply shall be due in accordance with Local Rule 230 and the new
8
January 24, 2014, hearing date.
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation is GRANTED in
11
12
part, and the December 16, 2013 hearing is VACATED and RESET for January 24, 2014.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: November 25, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ciem0h3i
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?