Mitchell v. DaViga, et al.
Filing
105
ORDER TERMINATING 94 95 Requests for Attendance of Incarcerated Inmates as Unwilling Witnesses at Trial, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/10/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COREY MITCHELL,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 1:13-cv-01324-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
CHAVEZ; SGT. SHELDON,
ORDER TERMINATING REQUESTS FOR
ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED
INMATES AS UNWILLING WITNESSES AT
TRIAL
Defendants.
(Doc. Nos. 94, 95)
17
18
On April 1, 2017, plaintiff filed requests for attendance of incarcerated inmates Alfred
19
Baylor and Cleave McCloud as unwilling witnesses at the trial of this action. (Doc. Nos. 94 and
20
95.) At the telephonic trial confirmation hearing held on March 17, 2017, the court denied
21
plaintiff’s request for attendance of incarcerated inmate Cleave McCloud without prejudice.
22
(Doc. No. 100.) The court deferred on ruling on plaintiff’s request for attendance of incarcerated
23
inmate Alfred Baylor, because, as discussed at the trial confirmation hearing, the request would
24
be rendered moot if photographs of Baylor’s gang affiliated tattoos were produced and deemed to
25
be adequate by plaintiff’s counsel for use at trial. (Doc. No. 104 at 17.) Plaintiff had previously
26
subpoenaed Mule Creek State Prison for photographs of Baylor’s gang affiliated tattoos. (Doc.
27
No. 104 at 16.) On May 9, 2017, plaintiff’s attorney, Justin Thomas, notified the court that the
28
photos produced pursuant to the subpoena had rendered Baylor’s attendance at trial unnecessary.
1
1
Accordingly,
2
1) The court’s denial of plaintiff’s request for attendance of incarcerated inmate Cleave
3
McCloud as an unwilling witness at trial (Doc. No. 95) is confirmed and that request is
4
and has been denied; and
5
2) Plaintiff’s request for attendance of incarcerated inmate Alfred Baylor as an unwilling
6
7
8
witness at trial (Doc. No. 94) is denied as having been rendered moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 10, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?