Infinity v. Ho et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and ORDER DENYING 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/20/2013. Amended Complaint due within sixty (60) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 INFINITY, 12 13 14 CASE No. 1:13-cv-01331-MJS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL v. CHEN HO, et al., (ECF No. 16) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Infinity is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) On November 18, 2013, 19 Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a sixty day extension of time and the appointment of 20 counsel. 21 arthritis and a disk disease for which he takes strong narcotics. The pain and side 22 effects make writing and thinking very difficult. (Id. at 1.) (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff contends that he has progressively degenerative 23 On November 19, 2013, Attorney Benjamin Pavone joined Plaintiff’s request for 24 an extension of time. (ECF No. 17.) Mr. Pavone seeks additional time to formally 25 appear on behalf of Plaintiff and address the Court’s October 30, 2013 Screening Order. 26 Good cause having been presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 Plaintiff’s Motion to extend time to file an amended complaint is GRANTED such that Plaintiff shall file his amended pleading within sixty (60) days following service 1 1 2 3 of this order; and 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED as moot since he is in the process of retaining private counsel. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2013 /s/ 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END: 8 Michael J. Seng ci4d6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?