Moore v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al.
Filing
55
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Date for Pretrial Conference and Request for Telephonic Appearance, Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/3/2014. The Pretrial Conference set for 1/8/2015 is CONTINUED to 1/15/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Counsel is permitted to appear telephonically at this conference. (Arellano, S.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
12
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
GREGORY F. HURLEY, Cal. Bar No. 126791
ghurley@sheppardmullin.com
MICHAEL J. CHILLEEN, Cal. Bar No. 210704
mchilleen@sheppardmullin.com
650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993
Telephone: 714.513.5100; Facsimile: 714.513.5130
13
Attorneys for Defendant DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
RONALD MOORE,
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
vs.
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., dba
DOLLAR TREE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:13-cv-01336-LJO-BAM
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE
FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCES; ORDER
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE; ORDER
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, the pre-trial conference in this matter is currently scheduled for January 8,
2015;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff, Ronald Moore (“Moore”), will be out of the country
on January 8, 2015 and unable to attend the pre-trial conference as currently scheduled;
WHEREAS, the Court has indicated its availability for January 15, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. for
the pre-trial conference; and
7
WHEREAS, Moore’s counsel’s office is in San Jose, California, and Defendant, Dollar
8
Tree Stores, Inc. (“Dollar Tree”)’s counsel’s office is in Costa Mesa, California – both a
9
significant distance from the Fresno courthouse. Accordingly, counsel for Moore and Dollar
10
Tree both request that they be able to appear at the pre-trial conference by telephone in order to
11
save the parties significant fees and costs.
12
NOW, THEREFORE, Moore and Dollar Tree, by and through their respective attorneys
13
of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the pre-trial conference from January 8, 2015
14
to January 15, 2015 at 8:30 a.m., subject to Court approval.
15
Counsel for Moore and Dollar Tree hereby further request that they be permitted to
16
appear telephonically at the pre-trial conference, such appearance to be arranged by Moore’s
17
counsel through AT&T teleconference services who will have trial counsel on the line prior to
18
conferencing in chambers at 8:30 a.m.
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND REQUESTED.
20
21
22
23
Date: December 3, 2014
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ronald Moore
24
25
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
26
27
28
/s/ Gregory F. Hurley
Gregory F. Hurley
Attorneys for Defendant
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. dba Dollar Tree
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE; ORDER
Page 2
1
ORDER
2
3
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pre-trial conference be continued from January 8,
5
2015 to January 15, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all counsel may appear telephonically at the pre-trial
7
conference, such appearances to be arranged by counsel for Plaintiff by ensuring both trial
8
counsel are on the line prior to conferencing in chambers at the designated time.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
December 3, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE; ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?