Curry v. Heid, et al.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/8/2013 vacating hearing date and taking matter under submission re 9 , 12 Motion to Dismiss. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFFORD E. CURRY, Sr., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 1:13-cv-01382 – LJO-BAM v. TOM HEID, RICHARD MEHAFFEY, UNITED STATES, ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION (Doc. 12). Defendant. 16 17 Defendant United States has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Clifford 18 Curry for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. (Doc. 9). The matter is 19 currently set for hearing and decision on November 15, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable 20 Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. On November 5, 2013, the last of the briefing was timely received. 21 (Docs. 14, 15). The Court has reviewed the moving papers and has determined that this matter 22 has been adequately briefed and is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 23 230(g). 24 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The previously set hearing date of November 15, 2013, is VACATED, the parties 26 shall not appear at that time, and the Court will take the matter under submission and will 27 thereafter issue its decision; and 28 1 1 2 3 4 2. Defense Counsel shall immediately contact Plaintiff by telephone informing him of this order and that the hearing has been vacated. 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at the following addresses: 5 6 7 8 9 Clifford E. Curry, Sr. 301 Standiford Avenue, #243 Modesto, California 95350 Clifford E. Curry, Sr. 1820 Pennebaker Way, No. 274 Manteca, California 95336 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara November 8, 2013 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?