Garcia v. Martinez et al
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; Further recommended that DISMISSAL of this action count as a strike under 28: USC 1915(g), re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by George Garcia, referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/30/2013. Objections to F&R due by 1/21/2014 (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GEORGE GARCIA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
G. MARTINEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
1:13-cv-01389-LJO-JLT (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE,
FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON
WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED AND
TO COUNT AS A STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. '
1915(g)
(Docs. 4, 6, 10)
15-DAY DEADLINE
17
18
Plaintiff, George Garcia, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
19
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 30, 2013. On September 4, 2013,
20
the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
21
be granted and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 days. 28 U.S.C. §
22
1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff requested and received an extension of time to file an
23
amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the
24
Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which
25
relief may be granted under section 1983.
26
27
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's
28
1
1
failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. It is further
2
recommended that dismissal of this action count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 15
days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written
objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's
Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d
1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
December 30, 2013
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
12
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?