Valencia v. Kokor

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF re 42 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANIEL G. VALENCIA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01391-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF

WINFRED KOKOR,
(Document 42)

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff Daniel G. Valencia (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in

17
18

this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August 30, 2013. On

19

February 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the Court’s intervention in his work assignment

20

and medical care. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

21

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 11, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that the

22
23

motion be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained

24

notice that any objections must be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

2

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

3

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

6
7
8
9

The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 11, 2015, are adopted in full;
and

2.
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Document 37-2) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

March 23, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2