Valencia v. Kokor
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF re 42 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL G. VALENCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:13-cv-01391-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
WINFRED KOKOR,
(Document 42)
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Daniel G. Valencia (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in
17
18
this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August 30, 2013. On
19
February 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the Court’s intervention in his work assignment
20
and medical care. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
21
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 11, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that the
22
23
motion be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained
24
notice that any objections must be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de
2
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
3
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
6
7
8
9
The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 11, 2015, are adopted in full;
and
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Document 37-2) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
March 23, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?