Cook v. Davis et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted Under Section 1983; ORDER That Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/27/2014. CASE CLOSED (Strike). (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RANDY COOK,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

Case No. 1:13-cv-01413-SKO (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE
A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY
BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

RON DAVIS, et al.,
(Docs. 1 and 7)
Defendants.

14

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT
TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(G)

15
_____________________________________/
16
17

Plaintiff Randy Cook, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 4, 2013. On May 9, 2014, the Court
19 dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim under section 1983 and ordered Plaintiff
20 to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). More
21 than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the
22 Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which
23 relief may be granted.
24

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is

25 HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1 relief may be granted under section 1983. This dismissal is subject to the “three-strikes” provision
2 set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 2011).
3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 27, 2014

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2