Moore v. Carrilo et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION for Dismissal fo Action; ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/27/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD MOORE, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. LISANDRO CARRILO, et al., Defendants. ) No. 1:13-cv-01417-LJO-SKO ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants 2 Lisandro Carrillo; Lidia Corvera dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana; and Ismael Corvera 3 dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana, the parties to this action, by and through their 4 respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above- 5 captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own 6 attorneys’ fees and costs. 7 8 Date: January 27, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 9 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore 10 11 12 13 14 Date: January 27, 2014 15 16 /s/ Bruce A. Neilson Bruce A. Neilson Attorneys for Defendants Lisandro Carrillo; Lidia Corvera and Ismael Corvera dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana 17 18 ORDER 19 20 21 The parties having so stipulated, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 23 Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The clerk is directed to close this 24 action. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill January 27, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?