Moore v. Carrilo et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION for Dismissal fo Action; ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/27/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD MOORE,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
LISANDRO CARRILO, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:13-cv-01417-LJO-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants
2
Lisandro Carrillo; Lidia Corvera dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana; and Ismael Corvera
3
dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana, the parties to this action, by and through their
4
respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-
5
captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own
6
attorneys’ fees and costs.
7
8
Date: January 27, 2014
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
9
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
10
11
12
13
14
Date: January 27, 2014
15
16
/s/ Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson
Attorneys for Defendants
Lisandro Carrillo; Lidia Corvera and Ismael
Corvera dba Mercado y Taqueria a la Mexicana
17
18
ORDER
19
20
21
The parties having so stipulated,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
23
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The clerk is directed to close this
24
action.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 27, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?