Torchia v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER RE AMENDED STIPULATION Regarding Plaintiff's Filing of First Amended Complaint and Defendant's Answer to First Amended Complaint re 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/12/2013. (Hall, S)

1 S. BRETT SUTTON 143107
[e-mail]
2 SUSAN K. HATMAKER 172543
[e-mail]
3 JARED HAGUE 251517
[e-mail]
4 SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION
6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 214
5 Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
7 KATHY TORCHIA
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

* * *

11 KATHY TORCHIA, an individual, residing
in California,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

15 W.W. GRAINGER, INC., an Illinois
Corporation; and Does 1 through 50,
16 inclusive,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Sutton Hatmaker
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 214
FRESNO, CA 93704

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-CV-01427-LJO-JLT
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FILING
OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
ORDER
(Doc. 11)

28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER

1

Plaintiff KATHY TORCHIA (hereinafter “PLAINTIFF”), by and through her counsel of

2 record, and Defendant W.W. GRAINGER, INC. (hereinafter “DEFENDANT”), by and through
3 its counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
5

RECITALS AND JOINT STIPULATION
WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF desires to file a First Amended Complaint and has provided

6 DEFENDANT with a copy of the proposed First Amended Complaint;
7

WHEREAS, counsels for PLAINTIFF and DEFENDANT have conferred in good faith;

8

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

9

1. PLAINTIFF’s First Amended Complaint will be deemed filed and served once the

10 court issues the order approving filing of the First Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy
11 of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
12

2. DEFENDANT will file and serve its response to the First Amended Complaint thirty

13 (30) days after the court enters an order granting this joint stipulation.
14
15 DATED: November 12, 2013
CORPORATION
16

SUTTON

HATMAKER

LAW

A California Professional Corporation

17
18
By:

19

S. BRETT SUTTON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATHY TORCHIA

20
21
22

DATED: November 12, 2013

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

23
24

By

/s/ Christopher M. Ahearn
CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN
Attorney for Defendant
W.W. GRAINGER

25
26
27
Sutton Hatmaker
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 214
FRESNO, CA 93704

28
2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER

______

1
2

ORDER

3

Based on the above stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS:

4

1.

The stipulation allowing Plaintiff to file her first amended complaint is

5 GRANTED IN PART;
6

2.

Plaintiff SHALL file her first amended complaint within two court days of

7 service of this order;
8

3.

Defendant SHALL file and serve its responsive pleading to the first amended

9 complaint within 30 days of filing of the first amended complaint.
10
11 IT IS SO ORDERED.
12

Dated:

November 12, 2013

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Sutton Hatmaker
Law Corporation
6715 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 214
FRESNO, CA 93704

28
3
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER