Herrera v. Macias et al
Filing
16
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs. 12 ), ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions For Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Docs. 9 , 10 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/18/2014. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERTO HERRERA,
12
13
14
15
1:13-cv-01429-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 12.)
vs.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Docs. 9, 10.)
GILL, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Roberto Herrera (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
20
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
21
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
22
On January 21, 2014, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
23
Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 12.) On February 6,
24
2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 13.)
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
26
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
27
including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be
28
supported by the record and proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
4
5
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January
21, 2014, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2.
Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 10, 2013
and October 23, 2013 are DENIED.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 18, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?