Revada v. Heise et al
ORDER TRANSFERRING Caseto the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/18/13: New Case Number 2:13-cv-01941 KJN (PC). Old Case Number 1:13-cv-01458 SKO (PC). (Hellings, J)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DIMETRI M. REVADA,
1:13-cv-01458 SKO (PC)
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
R. HEISE, et al.,
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged
violations took place in Folsom, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed
in the Sacramento Division.
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will
be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not rule on plaintiff's request to proceed in
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 18, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?