Gray v. Johnson et al

Filing 228

ORDER Adopting 201 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Plaintiff's 192 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, without Prejudice signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/10/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANA GRAY,

12
13
14
15

No. 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA
Plaintiff,

v.
DR. V. ROMERO et al.,
Defendants.

16

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(Doc. Nos. 192, 201)

17
18
19

Plaintiff Dana Gray is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil

20

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

21

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22

On April 13, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,

23

recommending that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied, without

24

prejudice. (Doc. No. 201.) The parties were granted fourteen days in which to file objections to

25

the findings and recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen-day time period has passed, and no

26

objections have been filed.

27

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

28

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
1

1

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

2

Accordingly,

3

1. The April 13, 2017 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 201) are adopted in full;

4
5

and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 192) is denied, without

6
7
8

prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 10, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2