Gray v. Johnson et al

Filing 262

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 257 Motion to Withdraw Request; ORDER Withdrawing Plaintiff's Request for Telephonic Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/31/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANA GRAY, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, vs. ROMERO, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW REQUEST (ECF No. 257.) ORDER WITHDRAWING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE (ECF No. 250.) Dana Gray (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was filed on September 12, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) 15 On August 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request for a telephonic case management 16 conference. (ECF No. 250.) On August 22, 2017, defendants filed objections. (ECF No. 253.) 17 On August 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily withdraw her request for a 18 telephonic case management conference. (ECF No. 257.) Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s 19 motion to withdraw shall be granted. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw, filed on August 28, 2017, is GRANTED; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s request for a telephonic case management conference, filed on August 17, 2017, is WITHDRAWN from the court’s calendar. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2017 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?