Gray v. Johnson et al
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 56 Motion to Supplement Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/2/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANA GRAY,
12
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01473 DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT
v.
(Document 56)
14
15
JOHNSON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Dana Gray (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
filed this civil rights action on September 12, 2013.
On February 4, 2016, the Court found that Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint stated an
20
Eighth Amendment claim and negligence claim against Defendants Mundunuri, Ziomek, Rebel,
21
Romero, Comelli and Loadholt.
22
Service documents were forwarded to the United States Marshal on February 24, 2016.
23
Defendant Rebel filed a motion to dismiss on April 29, 2016. Defendant Comelli filed an
24
25
26
27
28
answer on April 29, 2016. The remaining Defendants have not yet appeared.
Also on April 29, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to “supplement” the complaint. She requests
that the Court order Defendants to answer the complaint.
Whether and when the remaining Defendants file an answer depends on whether they are
successfully served, when they are successfully served, and how they decide to respond to this
1
1
action. The Court does not order Defendants to file an answer, and Plaintiff’s motion is therefore
2
DENIED.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
May 2, 2016
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?