Gray v. Johnson et al

Filing 66

ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants Loadholt, Mundunuri and Romero, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/3/16. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANA GRAY,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

Case No. 1:13-cv-01473-DLB PC
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANTS
LOADHOLT, MUNDUNURI AND ROMERO

ROMERO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action.

17
18

The action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth

19

Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt.
On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, only

20
21

Defendant Comelli had filed an answer. 1
On May 3, 2016, Defendants Loadholt, Mundunuri and Romero filed an answer. Therefore,

22
23

the Court EXTENDS the May 2, 2016, Discovery and Scheduling Order to these Defendants.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

26

/s/ Dennis

May 3, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

Defendant Rebel filed a motion to dismiss, which is pending. Defendant Ziomek has not yet appeared.

1