Gray v. Johnson et al
Filing
83
ORDER Extending 60 Discovery and Scheduling Order to DEFENDANT ZIOMEK, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 05/26/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANA GRAY,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:13-cv-01473-DLB PC
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY
AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO
DEFENDANT ZIOMEK
ROMERO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action.
18
The action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth
19
Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt.
20
21
22
23
On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, not all
Defendants had appeared in this action.
On May 25, 2016, Defendant Ziomek filed an answer. Therefore, the Court EXTENDS the
May 2, 2016, Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Ziomek.
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
May 26, 2016
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
