Aurora Bank FSB v. Lenox Financial Mortgage Corporation
Filing
51
ORDER RE STIPULATION for CONTINUANCE of Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and for an Extension of Briefing Schedule, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/23/14.(Response: 2/3/2014, Reply: 2/10/2014, Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii) (Martin-Gill, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AURORA COMMERCIAL CORP.
Successor entity to Aurora Bank FSB
vs.
CASE NO. 13-CV-01489-AWI-JLT
Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR
AN EXTENSION OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
LENOX FINANCIAL MORTGAGE
CORPORATION
Defendant.
8
9
10
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Continuance of
11
Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and for an Extension of
12
Briefing Schedule, and good cause appearing therefor,
13
HEREBY ORDERS, that Aurora’s response shall be filed on or before
14
February 3, 2014, Lenox’s reply shall be filed on or before February 10, 2014, and
15
the hearing on Lenox’s motion for summary judgment is continued to March 17,
16
2014 at 1:30 p.m. The deadlines associated with Local Rule 230 are superseded
17
and replaced by the deadlines stated in this Order for purposes of the Motion only.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated: January 23, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?