Aurora Bank FSB v. Lenox Financial Mortgage Corporation

Filing 51

ORDER RE STIPULATION for CONTINUANCE of Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and for an Extension of Briefing Schedule, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/23/14.(Response: 2/3/2014, Reply: 2/10/2014, Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AURORA COMMERCIAL CORP. Successor entity to Aurora Bank FSB vs. CASE NO. 13-CV-01489-AWI-JLT Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE LENOX FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION Defendant. 8 9 10 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Continuance of 11 Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and for an Extension of 12 Briefing Schedule, and good cause appearing therefor, 13 HEREBY ORDERS, that Aurora’s response shall be filed on or before 14 February 3, 2014, Lenox’s reply shall be filed on or before February 10, 2014, and 15 the hearing on Lenox’s motion for summary judgment is continued to March 17, 16 2014 at 1:30 p.m. The deadlines associated with Local Rule 230 are superseded 17 and replaced by the deadlines stated in this Order for purposes of the Motion only. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: January 23, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?