McCoy v. Garikaparthi et al

Filing 49

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants Garikaparthi, Steiber, Keeler and Chavez to File Responsive Pleading,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/04/2017. (21-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 LAKEITH MCCOY, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. M. GARIKAPARTHI, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13-cv-01495-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS GARIKAPARTHI, STEIBER, KEELER AND CHAVEZ TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff LaKeith McCoy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds 17 against Defendants Garikaparthi, Steiber, Keeler and Chavez (“Defendants”) for violation of 18 Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights arising from the alleged deprivation of adequate food. 19 On March 3, 2017, the Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 48.) 20 Accordingly, Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s first 21 amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 Dated: /s/ Barbara April 4, 2017 A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?