Rodriguez v. Taco Bell Corp.

Filing 71

Order requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Issue For Failure to Comply With Court Order and Continuing Pretrial Conference to March 4, 2016, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/22/2016. (Show Cause Response due by 2/29/2016; Pretrial Conference currently set for 2/26/2016 is CONTINUED to 3/4/2016 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BERNARDINA RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

Case No. 1:13-cv-01498-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER AND
CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
TO MARCH 4, 2016

v.
TACO BELL CORP.,
Defendant.

15

(ECF No. 43)
16
DEADLINE: FEBRUARY 29, 2016
17
18
19

On December 16, 2013, a scheduling order issued in this action setting forth pretrial

20 dates. (ECF No. 43.) There is a pretrial conference set for February 26, 2016 and pursuant to
21 the scheduling order and Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the parties were to
22 submit a joint pretrial statement by Friday, February 19, 2016. L.R. 281.
23

On February 19, 2016, Defendant filed a pretrial statement indicating that it was unable

24 to obtain Plaintiff’s compliance in submitting a joint statement. Plaintiff did not participate in
25 the pretrial statement, file a pretrial statement, or otherwise address the requirement set forth in
26 the December 16, 2013 scheduling order.
27

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

28

1.

The pretrial conference set for February 26, 2016, is CONTINUED to March 4,

1

2016, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9;

1
2.

2

On or before February 29, 2016, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why

3

sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with this court’s December

4

16, 2013 scheduling order. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to show

5

cause may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of this

6

action for failure to prosecute.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated:

February 22, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2