National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Young's Commercial Transfer, Inc. et al.

Filing 280

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Terminate Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/28/17. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CELIA RAMIREZ,

12

Plaintiff

13
14
15

v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, et al.,

Case No. 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 279)

Defendants.

16

On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff Celia Ramirez filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal

17
18

dismissing her claims against Defendants National Railroad Passenger Corporation a/k/a Amtrak

19

and Barbara Neu. (ECF No. 279).
In light of the parties’ stipulation, the claims against Defendants National Railroad

20
21

Passenger Corporation a/k/a Amtrak and Barbara Neu have been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P.

22

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed with

23

prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has

24

filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of

25

dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\
1

1
2

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate National Railroad
Passenger Corporation a/k/a Amtrak and Barbara Neu as Defendants in this case.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 28, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2