National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Young's Commercial Transfer, Inc. et al.
Filing
52
ORDER Dismissing Parties in Lead Case of Consolidated Action, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
No. 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG
ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES IN LEAD
CASE OF CONSOLIDATED ACTION
v.
YOUNG’S COMMERCIAL TRANSFER,
INC., a corporation, and RIGOBER TO
FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, an individual,
d/b/a JIMENEZ TRUCKING,
(Doc. No. 50)
Defendants.
18
19
AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION
20
21
On January 21, 2016, plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corporation and defendants
22
Young’s Commercial Transfer, Inc. and Rigoberto Fernandez Jimenez, individually and d/b/a
23
Jimenez Trucking, filed a joint stipulation dismissing National Railroad Passenger Corporation
24
v. Young’s Commercial Transfer, Inc., et al., with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs
25
and attorneys’ fees in this consolidated action. (Doc. No. 50.) In light of the parties’ stipulation,
26
the complaint filed by plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corporation against defendants
27
Young’s Commercial Transfer, Inc. and Rigoberto Fernandez Jimenez, as an individual, d/b/a
28
Jimenez Trucking is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of attorneys’ fees
1
1
and costs to either party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d
2
688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action is terminated as to plaintiff National Railroad Passenger
3
Corporation and defendants Young’s Commercial Transfer, Inc. and Rigoberto Fernandez
4
Jimenez, as an individual, d/b/a Jimenez Trucking only as to the claims brought by plaintiff
5
National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
This order and dismissal, however, does not affect the status of the claims brought by
6
7
plaintiff Celia Ramirez in her complaint against defendants Rigoberto Fernandez Jimenez,
8
Jimenez Trucking, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Barbara Neu, BNSF Railway
9
Company, Young’s Commercial Transfer, Inc. and Does 1 through 200. The case number with
10
respect to claims brought by the remaining plaintiff against the remaining defendants will
11
continue to be 1:13-cv-01506-DAD-EPG.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
Dated:
January 25, 2016
16
DALE A. DROZD
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?