Manago v. Holland et al

Filing 22

ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's Third Motion for Reconsideration of Court's Order Dismissing Case 21 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/25/15. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEWART MANAGO,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.

1:13-cv-01523-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
THIRD MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
OF COURT’S ORDER DISMISSING CASE
(Doc. 21.)

K. HOLLAND, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Stewart Manago (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights

19

action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action

20

on September 20, 2013. (Doc. 1.) On September 30, 2013, Plaintiff filed motion to proceed in

21

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 4.)

22

order granting Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6.)

On October 8, 2013, the court issued an

23

On January 14, 2015, the court issued an order revoking Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

24

status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismissing the case, without prejudice to refiling

25

with the submission of the $400 filing fee. (Doc. 12.) On August 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed a

26

motion for reconsideration of the court’s January 14, 2015 order. (Doc. 21.)

27

This is Plaintiff’s third motion for reconsideration of the court’s January 14, 2015 order.

28

Plaintiff was advised in the court’s order of February 24, 2015, that “[n]o further motions for
1

1

reconsideration shall be considered in this case.”

2

Plaintiff’s present motion shall be disregarded.

3
4

(ECF No. 16 at 3 ¶III.2.)

Therefore,

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for
reconsideration, filed on August 20, 2015, is DISREGARDED.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 25, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2