Cottrell v. Ogbuehi et al
Filing
26
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/2014. Show Cause Response Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DALE L. COTTRELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
FELIX IGBINOSA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01530-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
[ECF No. 24]
Plaintiff Dale L. Cottrell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 23, 2014, the Court found that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated a
20
cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants C. Lackey,
21
Karen Berard, Ifeoma Ogbuehi, Rajib Das, Miran Park, Angelica Duenas, Felix Igbinosa, and Does 1
22
through 3. In that order, the Court forwarded Plaintiff the necessary service of process documents for
23
completion and return to the Court within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the
24
order. The October 23, 2014, order, specifically warned Plaintiff “[t]he failure to comply with this
25
order will result in dismissal of this action.” (ECF No. 24, 3:7.)
26
27
Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause within thirty (30) days from the
date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed as a sanction against him for
28
1
1
failing to obey a court order and failing to prosecute this action. The failure to comply with this order,
2
or the failure to show good cause, will result in dismissal of the action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
December 2, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?