Cottrell v. Ogbuehi et al
Filing
49
ORDER IMPOSING SERVICE COSTS ON DEFENDANT PARK AND REQUIRING HIM TO REIMBURSE USM $77.25 WITHIN THIRTY DAYS re 42 , 43 , 46 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/26/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DALE L. COTTRELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
FELIX IGBINOSA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-01530-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER IMPOSING SERVICE COSTS ON
DEFENDANT PARK AND REQUIRING HIM TO
REIMBURSE USM $77.25 WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
[ECF Nos. 42, 43, 46]
Plaintiff Dale L. Cottrell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed October 10, 2014,
20
against Defendants Lackey, Berard, Ogbuehi, Das, Park, Duenas, and Igbinosa for deliberate
21
indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
22
On July 8, 2015, the United States Marshals Office, which was responsible for service process
23
on Plaintiff’s behalf, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), filed a request for reimbursement of
24
the expenses incurred in effecting personal service on Defendant Park, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2)(A). On
25
July 15, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Park to show cause within fifteen days why the expenses
26
for personal service should not be taxed against him. (ECF No. 46.) More than fifteen days have
27
passed, and Defendant Park has not responded to the order. Defendant Park was warned that if he
28
“either (1) fails to respond to this order or (2) responds but fails to show good cause, he will be
1
1
required to reimburse the United States Marshals Service the $77.25 expense incurred in effecting
2
personal service.” (ECF No. 46, Order at 2:6-8.)
3
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, individuals have “a duty to avoid
4
unnecessary expenses of serving the summons.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). “If a defendant located
5
within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff
6
located within the United States, the court must impose on the defendant … the expense later incurred
7
in making service….” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2)(A).
8
Rule 4 imposes a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of service and while a defendant failing to
9
waive service must be given the opportunity to show good cause for the failure, sufficient cause
10
should be rare. Estate of Darulis v. Garate, 401 F.3d 1060, 1063-1064 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing to Fed.
11
R. Civ. P. Advisory Committee note on 1993 amendments). In this case, Defendant Park has failed to
12
respond to the order to show cause and has not presented good cause for failing to waive service. Fed.
13
R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2)(A); Estate of Darulis, 401 F.3d at 1063-1064.
14
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
15
1.
The expenses incurred by the United States Marshals Office in effective service are
imposed against Defendant Park;
16
2.
17
Defendant Park shall reimburse the United States Marshals Office $77.25 within thirty
(30) days from the date of service of this order;1 and
18
3.
19
The Clerk’s Office shall serve a copy of this order on the Sacramento Division of the
United States Marshals Office.
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated:
August 26, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
1
United States Marshals Office, 501 I. Street, Suite. 5600, Sacramento, CA 95814.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?