Cottrell v. Ogbuehi et al

Filing 98

ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's Notice of Failure to Receive Defendants' Reply to His Opposition and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Serve Courtesy Copy of Defendants' Reply on Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/30/17. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DALE L. COTTRELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FELIX IGBINOSA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Case No.: 1:13-cv-01530-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RECEIVE DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO HIS OPPOSITION AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE COURTESY COPY OF DEFENDANTS’ REPLY ON PLAINTIFF [ECF No. 97] Plaintiff Dale L. Cottrell is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) On January 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice indicating that he has not received a copy of Defendants’ reply to his opposition. 22 Plaintiff is advised that Defendants filed a timely reply on January 10, 2017, which was served 23 on Plaintiff by mail at his address of record. Based on Plaintiff’s contention that he has not received 24 such filing, the Court will direct the Clerk to serve a courtesy copy of Defendants’ reply on Plaintiff. 25 However, Plaintiff is advised that upon the filing of Defendants’ reply, the motion for summary 26 judgment is deemed submitted for review and no further filings by either party are allowed, absent 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 court order. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall 2 serve a courtesy copy of Defendants’ reply, filed January 10, 2017 (Doc. 96), on Plaintiff at his 3 address of record. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 January 30, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?