Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Fresno's Best Industrial Electric, Inc. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER to dismiss action without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/9/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-FRESNO DIVISION 9 * * * 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBEW LOCAL UNION NO. 100 PENSION TRUST FUND; 11 JOINT ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY TRAINING TRUST FUND; NATIONAL 12 ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND; and IBEW DISTRICT NO. 9 PENSION PLAN TRUST 13 FUND, Case No. 1:13-CV-01545 SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 FRESNO’S BEST INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC, INC.; AARON A. LANE; 17 WILLIAM JAMES MARVIN FORBES; DEBRA MICHELLE FORBES; AMERICAN 18 CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, 19 Defendants. 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund, Joint 24 Electrical Industry Training Trust Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund and IBEW District No. 25 9 Pension Plan Trust Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendants Fresno’s Best Industrial 26 Electric, Inc. Aaron A. Lane and American Contractors Indemnity Company (collectively, 27 “Settling Defendants”), by and through their respective counsels of record, hereby stipulate as to 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 the following:1 2 1. that the Parties have entered into a written Settlement Agreement concerning the 3 claims at issue in the present action, which call for Mr. Lane and Fresno’s Best 4 Industrial Electric, Inc. to perform certain actions over a period of time; 5 2. 6 that the Agreement provides for Plaintiffs to dismiss Settling Defendants from the present action, subject to the terms of the Agreement, in the meantime; 7 3. that, except as expressly provided in the Agreement, each Party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred to date in this action; and 8 9 4. that the Parties irrevocably agree that the United States District Court, Eastern 10 District of California, Fresno Division, and more particularly, the Magistrate 11 Judge herein, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement, to 12 the extent necessary. 13 The Parties therefore respectfully request an order, as proposed hereafter. 14 Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 1, 2014. 15 TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD 16 By 17 18 /s/ Henry Y. Chiu HENRY Y. CHIU Attorney for Plaintiffs 19 20 /// Dated: December 1, 2014. 21 LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY L. MYERS 22 By 23 24 25 /s/ Gregory L. Myers GREGORY L. MYERS Attorney for Defendants Fresno’s Best Industrial Electric Inc., Aaron A. Lane, and American Contractors Indemnity Company 26 27 28 1 Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the defendants William James Marvin Forbes and Debra Michelle Forbes, without prejudice, on February 26, 2014, subject to a written Tolling Agreement. The present Stipulation and Order to Dismiss, once ordered, shall resolve the entire action, subject to the terms hereof. 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 ORDER 2 The above Stipulation is accepted and adopted by the Court. 3 Plaintiffs’ claims against the Settling Defendants are hereby dismissed, without prejudice, 4 subject to the terms of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement, with the stipulating Parties to 5 bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees incurred to date in the action, except as 6 provided therein. 7 The Court shall retain jurisdiction until December 1, 2016, to issue any orders necessary 8 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: December 9, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?