Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Fresno's Best Industrial Electric, Inc. et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER to dismiss action without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/9/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-FRESNO DIVISION
9
* * *
10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBEW LOCAL
UNION NO. 100 PENSION TRUST FUND;
11 JOINT ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY
TRAINING TRUST FUND; NATIONAL
12 ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND; and IBEW
DISTRICT NO. 9 PENSION PLAN TRUST
13 FUND,
Case No. 1:13-CV-01545 SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16 FRESNO’S BEST INDUSTRIAL
ELECTRIC, INC.; AARON A. LANE;
17 WILLIAM JAMES MARVIN FORBES;
DEBRA MICHELLE FORBES; AMERICAN
18 CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY
COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50,
19
Defendants.
20
21
///
22
///
23
Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of IBEW Local Union No. 100 Pension Trust Fund, Joint
24
Electrical Industry Training Trust Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund and IBEW District No.
25
9 Pension Plan Trust Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendants Fresno’s Best Industrial
26
Electric, Inc. Aaron A. Lane and American Contractors Indemnity Company (collectively,
27
“Settling Defendants”), by and through their respective counsels of record, hereby stipulate as to
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1 the following:1
2
1.
that the Parties have entered into a written Settlement Agreement concerning the
3
claims at issue in the present action, which call for Mr. Lane and Fresno’s Best
4
Industrial Electric, Inc. to perform certain actions over a period of time;
5
2.
6
that the Agreement provides for Plaintiffs to dismiss Settling Defendants from the
present action, subject to the terms of the Agreement, in the meantime;
7
3.
that, except as expressly provided in the Agreement, each Party shall bear its own
costs and attorneys’ fees incurred to date in this action; and
8
9
4.
that the Parties irrevocably agree that the United States District Court, Eastern
10
District of California, Fresno Division, and more particularly, the Magistrate
11
Judge herein, shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement, to
12
the extent necessary.
13
The Parties therefore respectfully request an order, as proposed hereafter.
14
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 1, 2014.
15
TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD
16
By
17
18
/s/ Henry Y. Chiu
HENRY Y. CHIU
Attorney for Plaintiffs
19
20 ///
Dated: December 1, 2014.
21
LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY L. MYERS
22
By
23
24
25
/s/ Gregory L. Myers
GREGORY L. MYERS
Attorney for Defendants
Fresno’s Best Industrial Electric Inc., Aaron A.
Lane, and American Contractors Indemnity
Company
26
27
28
1
Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the defendants William James Marvin Forbes and Debra
Michelle Forbes, without prejudice, on February 26, 2014, subject to a written Tolling
Agreement. The present Stipulation and Order to Dismiss, once ordered, shall resolve the
entire action, subject to the terms hereof.
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
ORDER
2
The above Stipulation is accepted and adopted by the Court.
3
Plaintiffs’ claims against the Settling Defendants are hereby dismissed, without prejudice,
4 subject to the terms of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement, with the stipulating Parties to
5 bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees incurred to date in the action, except as
6 provided therein.
7
The Court shall retain jurisdiction until December 1, 2016, to issue any orders necessary
8 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
December 9, 2014
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?