Warkentine et al v. Soria et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERNCE. The Pretrial Conference is now set for January 29, 2016 at 01:30 PM and the Jury Trial is now set for 3/1/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/3/2015. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 G. DAVID ROBERTSON, ESQ. California State Bar No. 111984 MARILEE BRETERNITZ, ESQ. California State Bar No. 280830 ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & WILLIAMSON Bank of America Plaza 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 Telephone No. (775) 329-5600 Facsimile No. (775) 348-8300 Attorneys for EDWARD WARKENTINE and DANIEL TANKERSLEY 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 EDWARD WARKENTINE, an individual; and DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual, CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01550-MJS 13 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST) 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 HECTOR J. SORIA; DAN GRASSERAND; JOHNNY A. LEMUS; HECTOR LIZARRAGA; KRISTAL CHOJNACKI; GERRY GALVIN; FRANCISCO AMADOR; JOSEPH R. AMADOR; LEO CAPUCHINO; JOHN FLORES; ROBERT SILVA; CITY OF MENDOTA; JOSEPH RIOFRIO; BRYCE ATKINS; KORINA ZAMORA; MARTIN HERNANDEZ; SMITTY’S TOWING & AUTO DISMANTLING; ABRAHAM GONZALEZ; FELIPE GONZALEZ; GONZALEZ TOWING & TIRE SHOP; AND DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, that a short 25 continuance of the trial and pretrial conference in this matter should be granted. The reason for 26 the request is that Plaintiffs’ counsel has a calendar conflict in that he is scheduled to be in a 27 hearing on dispositive motions on January 15, 2016 in United States District Court, Eastern 28 District of California – Sacramento Division, which hearing is expected to consume the majority, Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST) 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 1 1 if not all, of the day. Due to the availability of the court and counsel, the pretrial conference in 2 this action cannot be rescheduled without continuing both the trial and pretrial conference. This 3 is the second request for a continuance of this matter. The parties request that the trial be 4 continued to March 1, 2016 and the pretrial conference be continued to January 29, 2016. 5 6 7 We have attempted to secure the signatures of the two pro per Gonzalez Defendants without success. However, we did make contact with the Gonzalez Defendants and they agreed to have the trial and pretrial conference continued to the foregoing dates. Dated: December 3, 2015 FIKE & BORANIAN 8 9 /s/ David A. Fike (as authorized on 12/3/15) David A. Fike, Attorneys for Defendants City of Mendota, et al. 10 11 ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & WILLIAMSON 12 13 /s/ G. David Robertson____________ G. David Robertson, Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER Good cause appearing, the proposed Stipulation to Continue the Pretrial and Trial dates in case 1:13-cv-1550-MJS is hereby approved and adopted as the Order of the Court. 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference in this case is continued to 20 21 22 January 29, 2016 at 1:30 PM and trial is continued to March 1, 2016 at 8:30 AM, both in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: December 3, 2015 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST) 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?