Warkentine et al v. Soria et al
Filing
109
STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERNCE. The Pretrial Conference is now set for January 29, 2016 at 01:30 PM and the Jury Trial is now set for 3/1/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/3/2015. (Yu, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
G. DAVID ROBERTSON, ESQ.
California State Bar No. 111984
MARILEE BRETERNITZ, ESQ.
California State Bar No. 280830
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & WILLIAMSON
Bank of America Plaza
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone No. (775) 329-5600
Facsimile No. (775) 348-8300
Attorneys for EDWARD WARKENTINE
and DANIEL TANKERSLEY
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
EDWARD WARKENTINE, an individual; and
DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual,
CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01550-MJS
13
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST)
14
v.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
HECTOR J. SORIA; DAN GRASSERAND;
JOHNNY A. LEMUS; HECTOR
LIZARRAGA; KRISTAL CHOJNACKI;
GERRY GALVIN; FRANCISCO AMADOR;
JOSEPH R. AMADOR; LEO CAPUCHINO;
JOHN FLORES; ROBERT SILVA; CITY OF
MENDOTA; JOSEPH RIOFRIO; BRYCE
ATKINS; KORINA ZAMORA; MARTIN
HERNANDEZ; SMITTY’S TOWING &
AUTO DISMANTLING; ABRAHAM
GONZALEZ; FELIPE GONZALEZ;
GONZALEZ TOWING & TIRE SHOP; AND
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, that a short
25
continuance of the trial and pretrial conference in this matter should be granted. The reason for
26
the request is that Plaintiffs’ counsel has a calendar conflict in that he is scheduled to be in a
27
hearing on dispositive motions on January 15, 2016 in United States District Court, Eastern
28
District of California – Sacramento Division, which hearing is expected to consume the majority,
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST)
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 1
1
if not all, of the day. Due to the availability of the court and counsel, the pretrial conference in
2
this action cannot be rescheduled without continuing both the trial and pretrial conference. This
3
is the second request for a continuance of this matter. The parties request that the trial be
4
continued to March 1, 2016 and the pretrial conference be continued to January 29, 2016.
5
6
7
We have attempted to secure the signatures of the two pro per Gonzalez Defendants
without success. However, we did make contact with the Gonzalez Defendants and they agreed
to have the trial and pretrial conference continued to the foregoing dates.
Dated: December 3, 2015
FIKE & BORANIAN
8
9
/s/ David A. Fike
(as authorized on 12/3/15)
David A. Fike, Attorneys for Defendants
City of Mendota, et al.
10
11
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER &
WILLIAMSON
12
13
/s/ G. David Robertson____________
G. David Robertson, Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER
Good cause appearing, the proposed Stipulation to Continue the Pretrial and Trial dates in
case 1:13-cv-1550-MJS is hereby approved and adopted as the Order of the Court.
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference in this case is continued to
20
21
22
January 29, 2016 at 1:30 PM and trial is continued to March 1, 2016 at 8:30 AM, both in
Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
December 3, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (SECOND REQUEST)
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?