Warkentine et al v. Soria et al
Filing
78
Amended Stipulation and Order To Continue Trial (First Request) and Related Discovery and Motion Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/13/2015. (Yu, L)
1
2
3
4
5
G. DAVID ROBERTSON, ESQ.
California State Bar No. 111984
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & WILLIAMSON
Bank of America Plaza
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone No. (775) 329-5600
Facsimile No. (775) 348-8300
Attorneys for EDWARD WARKENTINE
and DANIEL TANKERSLEY
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
11
EDWARD WARKENTINE, an individual; and
DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
v.
HECTOR J. SORIA; DAN GRASSERAND;
JOHNNY A. LEMUS; HECTOR
LIZARRAGA; KRISTAL CHOJNACKI;
GERRY GALVIN; FRANCISCO AMADOR;
JOSEPH R. AMADOR; LEO CAPUCHINO;
JOHN FLORES; ROBERT SILVA; CITY OF
MENDOTA; JOSEPH RIOFRIO; BRYCE
ATKINS; KORINA ZAMORA; MARTIN
HERNANDEZ; SMITTY’S TOWING &
AUTO DISMANTLING; ABRAHAM
GONZALEZ; FELIPE GONZALEZ;
GONZALEZ TOWING & TIRE SHOP; AND
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01550-MJS
***AMENDED*** STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST
REQUEST) AND RELATED
DISCOVERY AND MOTION
DEADLINES
Defendants.
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, that a short
24
continuance of the trial in this matter should be granted in the interests of justice to both allow
25
the parties to complete discovery and also allow adequate time for the parties to brief, and for the
26
Court to consider, dispositive motions expected to be filed in this matter. This is the first request
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
for a continuance of the trial in this matter.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY
AND MOTION DEADLINES
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 1
1
The parties have been working diligently in discovery to prepare for trial; however, the
2
parties have encountered various issues which necessitate a continuance. For example, Plaintiffs
3
recently located a large volume of documents which did not previously appear to be important to
4
5
6
the prosecution of this case, but which now appear to be relevant in light of facts uncovered to
date during the discovery process. Plaintiffs are thus currently working on a supplemental
production.
The Defendants will need additional time to review those documents, depose
additional witnesses disclosed by the documents, and prepare their dispositive motion(s). In
7
addition, Plaintiffs are awaiting certain discovery responses from the City Defendants, which
8
9
10
Plaintiffs must review prior to taking some of the depositions, and those responses may also
require additional investigation. Further, the parties have encountered scheduling conflicts with
some of the necessary depositions, which have also impacted the parties’ ability to file and
11
respond to dispositive motions under the current schedule. Finally, the parties understand and
12
share the Court’s concern in its March 31, 2015 Order Amending Scheduling Order regarding
13
the compressed timeline to resolve the dispositive motions. Thus, the parties now seek a short
14
continuance to allow the parties to complete discovery and to further allow adequate time for the
15
parties to brief, and for the Court to consider, all dispositive motions filed in this matter.
16
The below parties therefore respectfully request an approximately four-month
17
continuance of the trial to the end of January 2016 or beginning of February 2016, or another
18
time that is mutually agreeable to the parties and the Court. The below parties also request that
19
20
21
expert and non-expert discovery be extended at least to August 21, 2015, the non-dispositive
motion filing deadline to August 31, 2015, and the dispositive motion filing deadline to
September 30, 2015.
We have also attempted to secure the signatures of the two pro per Gonzalez Defendants
22
23
24
25
without success, but they have verbally agreed to the continuance.
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON,
Dated: May 8, 2015
MILLER & WILLIAMSON
/s/ G. David Robertson_________________
G. David Robertson, Attorneys for Plaintiffs
26
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY
AND MOTION DEADLINES
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 2
FIKE & BORANIAN
1
/s/ David A. Fike
David A. Fike, Attorneys for Defendants City of
Mendota, et al.
2
3
4
5
ORDER
6
7
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Trial set in this
8
matter is continued to February 9, 2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before U.S.
9
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Further, expert and non-expert discovery may continue until
10
11
August 21, 2015, the non-dispositive motion filing deadline is extended to August 31, 2015, and
the dispositive motion filing deadline is extended to September 30, 2015.
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 13, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY
AND MOTION DEADLINES
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
Pursuant to FRCP 5(b) and Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby certify that I am an employee
3
of Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson, over the age of eighteen, and not a party to the
4
within action. I further certify that on the 8th day of May, 2015, I electronically filed the
5
foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST)
6
AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES with the Clerk of the Court by
7
using the ECF system which sends a notice of the filing to the following:
David A. Fike, Esq.
(Calif. State Bar No. 95325)
Fike & Boranian
401 Clovis Avenue, Suite 208
Clovis, CA 93612
Telephone: (559) 229-2200
Facsimile: (559) 225-5504
Email: dfike@fikeboranianlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants City of Mendota,
Hector J. Soria, Dan Grasserand, Johnny A.
Lemus, Hector Lizarraga, Kristal Chojnacki,
Gerry Galvin, Francisco Amador, Joseph R.
Amador, Leo Capuchino, John Flores, Robert
Silva, Joseph Riofrio, Bryce Atkins and
Korina Zamora
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I further certify that on the 8th day of May, 2015, I caused to be deposited in the U.S.
17
Mail, first-class postage fully prepaid, a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION
18
AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED
19
DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES, addressed to the following:
Abraham Gonzalez
Felipe Gonzalez
dba Gonzalez Towing & Tire Shop
1297 Oller Street
Mendota, CA 93640
Defendants in pro per
20
21
22
23
24
/s/ Teresa W. Stovak
An Employee of Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
25
26
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY
AND MOTION DEADLINES
1:13-CV-01550- MJS
PAGE 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?