Warkentine et al v. Soria et al

Filing 78

Amended Stipulation and Order To Continue Trial (First Request) and Related Discovery and Motion Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/13/2015. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 G. DAVID ROBERTSON, ESQ. California State Bar No. 111984 ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & WILLIAMSON Bank of America Plaza 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 Telephone No. (775) 329-5600 Facsimile No. (775) 348-8300 Attorneys for EDWARD WARKENTINE and DANIEL TANKERSLEY 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 11 EDWARD WARKENTINE, an individual; and DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. HECTOR J. SORIA; DAN GRASSERAND; JOHNNY A. LEMUS; HECTOR LIZARRAGA; KRISTAL CHOJNACKI; GERRY GALVIN; FRANCISCO AMADOR; JOSEPH R. AMADOR; LEO CAPUCHINO; JOHN FLORES; ROBERT SILVA; CITY OF MENDOTA; JOSEPH RIOFRIO; BRYCE ATKINS; KORINA ZAMORA; MARTIN HERNANDEZ; SMITTY’S TOWING & AUTO DISMANTLING; ABRAHAM GONZALEZ; FELIPE GONZALEZ; GONZALEZ TOWING & TIRE SHOP; AND DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, CASE NO.: 1:13-CV-01550-MJS ***AMENDED*** STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES Defendants. 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, that a short 24 continuance of the trial in this matter should be granted in the interests of justice to both allow 25 the parties to complete discovery and also allow adequate time for the parties to brief, and for the 26 Court to consider, dispositive motions expected to be filed in this matter. This is the first request 27 28 Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 for a continuance of the trial in this matter. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 1 1 The parties have been working diligently in discovery to prepare for trial; however, the 2 parties have encountered various issues which necessitate a continuance. For example, Plaintiffs 3 recently located a large volume of documents which did not previously appear to be important to 4 5 6 the prosecution of this case, but which now appear to be relevant in light of facts uncovered to date during the discovery process. Plaintiffs are thus currently working on a supplemental production. The Defendants will need additional time to review those documents, depose additional witnesses disclosed by the documents, and prepare their dispositive motion(s). In 7 addition, Plaintiffs are awaiting certain discovery responses from the City Defendants, which 8 9 10 Plaintiffs must review prior to taking some of the depositions, and those responses may also require additional investigation. Further, the parties have encountered scheduling conflicts with some of the necessary depositions, which have also impacted the parties’ ability to file and 11 respond to dispositive motions under the current schedule. Finally, the parties understand and 12 share the Court’s concern in its March 31, 2015 Order Amending Scheduling Order regarding 13 the compressed timeline to resolve the dispositive motions. Thus, the parties now seek a short 14 continuance to allow the parties to complete discovery and to further allow adequate time for the 15 parties to brief, and for the Court to consider, all dispositive motions filed in this matter. 16 The below parties therefore respectfully request an approximately four-month 17 continuance of the trial to the end of January 2016 or beginning of February 2016, or another 18 time that is mutually agreeable to the parties and the Court. The below parties also request that 19 20 21 expert and non-expert discovery be extended at least to August 21, 2015, the non-dispositive motion filing deadline to August 31, 2015, and the dispositive motion filing deadline to September 30, 2015. We have also attempted to secure the signatures of the two pro per Gonzalez Defendants 22 23 24 25 without success, but they have verbally agreed to the continuance. ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, Dated: May 8, 2015 MILLER & WILLIAMSON /s/ G. David Robertson_________________ G. David Robertson, Attorneys for Plaintiffs 26 27 28 Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 2 FIKE & BORANIAN 1 /s/ David A. Fike David A. Fike, Attorneys for Defendants City of Mendota, et al. 2 3 4 5 ORDER 6 7 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Trial set in this 8 matter is continued to February 9, 2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before U.S. 9 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Further, expert and non-expert discovery may continue until 10 11 August 21, 2015, the non-dispositive motion filing deadline is extended to August 31, 2015, and the dispositive motion filing deadline is extended to September 30, 2015. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2015 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to FRCP 5(b) and Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby certify that I am an employee 3 of Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson, over the age of eighteen, and not a party to the 4 within action. I further certify that on the 8th day of May, 2015, I electronically filed the 5 foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) 6 AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES with the Clerk of the Court by 7 using the ECF system which sends a notice of the filing to the following: David A. Fike, Esq. (Calif. State Bar No. 95325) Fike & Boranian 401 Clovis Avenue, Suite 208 Clovis, CA 93612 Telephone: (559) 229-2200 Facsimile: (559) 225-5504 Email: dfike@fikeboranianlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants City of Mendota, Hector J. Soria, Dan Grasserand, Johnny A. Lemus, Hector Lizarraga, Kristal Chojnacki, Gerry Galvin, Francisco Amador, Joseph R. Amador, Leo Capuchino, John Flores, Robert Silva, Joseph Riofrio, Bryce Atkins and Korina Zamora 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I further certify that on the 8th day of May, 2015, I caused to be deposited in the U.S. 17 Mail, first-class postage fully prepaid, a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION 18 AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED 19 DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES, addressed to the following: Abraham Gonzalez Felipe Gonzalez dba Gonzalez Towing & Tire Shop 1297 Oller Street Mendota, CA 93640 Defendants in pro per 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Teresa W. Stovak An Employee of Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 25 26 27 28 Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600 Reno, Nevada 89501 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL (FIRST REQUEST) AND RELATED DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES 1:13-CV-01550- MJS PAGE 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?