Quinones v. Donahoe

Filing 35

ORDER CONTINUING Settlement Conference; ORDER re: Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/23/2015. Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 8/26/2015 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

FELIPE S. QUINONES,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, POSTAMASTER )
)
GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL
)
SERVICE,
)
)
Defendant.
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01553 LJO GSA
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE; ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

17
18

The parties stipulated for the settlement conference to occur on August 18, 2015. (Doc. 34)

19

However, due to the unavailability of the Court, the settlement conference is CONTINUED to

20

August 26, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. at the United States Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

21

California.

22

Related to the conference, the Court ORDERS:

23

1.

24

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority to

25

negotiate and settle the case on any terms1 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a serious

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

26
27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in
the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the

1

1

matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the procedures

2

the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference:

3

a.

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to

4

Defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful settlement

5

demand which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate;

6

b.

Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the settlement conference, Defendant

7

SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful2

8

counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate.

9

c.

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their

10

settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below.

11

Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.

12

d.

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall

13

submit, directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a

14

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the

15

Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of

16

Lodging of Settlement Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked

17

“confidential” with the date and time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently

18

thereon;

19

e.

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

20

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case;

21

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

22

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the

23

parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of

24

the major issues in dispute;

25
26
27
28

authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party’s most recent
demand.
2
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

2

1

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date;

2

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

3

pretrial and trial;

4

E.

The relief sought;

5

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers

6

and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 23, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3