Nichols v. Pleasant Valley State Prison Warden

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 18 Respondent's Motion for Leave to Lodge the State Court Record in Support of the Answer in a "Computer-Readable Format" signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/28/2014. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 TOMMY J. NICHOLS, Case No. 1:13-cv-01561-AWI-BAM-HC 12 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO LODGE THE STATE COURT RECORD IN SUPPORT OF THE ANSWER IN A “COMPUTER-READABLE FORMAT” (DOC. 18) 13 Petitioner, v. 14 PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON 15 WARDEN, 16 17 Respondent. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. 21 On December 16, 2013, Respondent filed an answer to the 22 petition along with a motion for leave to lodge an electronic 23 version of the voluminous state court trial record, stating that the 24 transcripts had been filed in other cases in this Court in which 25 Petitioner’s co-defendants were parties. Respondent stated that it 26 was not unable to provide a paper copy of the records. In response 27 to the Court’s request, Respondent identified the other cases and 28 the specific docket numbers of the lodgings that pertained to the 1 1 present case. (Doc. 21.) Because paper copies of the voluminous 2 documents pertinent to the present case are available to the Court, 3 the Court will grant Respondent’s motion for leave to depart from 4 Local Rule 190(f), which otherwise requires filing paper copies of 5 state court records in habeas corpus proceedings. However, as 6 Respondent stated in the application, should the computer-readable 7 format ultimately prove unacceptable, Respondent is willing and able 8 to submit paper copies at the Court’s request. 9 Accordingly, Respondent’s motion for leave to lodge a record in 10 a computer-readable format is GRANTED. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: /s/ Barbara March 28, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?