Bussiere v. Kokor et al

Filing 112

ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether a Settlement Conference Would be Beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 09/19/2017. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

1:13-cv-01565-AWI-SKO (PC)

ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,
Plaintiff,

8

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

v.

9

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE
BENEFICIAL

Defendant.

7

TIGGS-BROWN,

10
11

Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

12
13

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was recently assigned to the

14

undersigned for all purposes. (Doc. 111.) While a settlement conference has been conducted

15

(Doc. 107), the parties were to continue negotiations after Plaintiff had an opportunity to review

16

case documents including District Judge Anthony W. Ishii’s order of April 4, 2017 (Doc. 94).

17

Thus, the parties shall notify the Court whether they feel further settlement conference would be

18

beneficial.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of

19
20

service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good

21

faith, that settlement is likely in this case and whether further settlement conference would be

22

beneficial. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Judge Ishii’s order of

23

April 4, 2017, (Doc. 94), with service of this order.

24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26

Dated:

September 19, 2017

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28

Sheila K. Oberto

1

.