Bussiere v. Kokor et al
ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether a Settlement Conference Would be Beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 09/19/2017. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE
Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was recently assigned to the
undersigned for all purposes. (Doc. 111.) While a settlement conference has been conducted
(Doc. 107), the parties were to continue negotiations after Plaintiff had an opportunity to review
case documents including District Judge Anthony W. Ishii’s order of April 4, 2017 (Doc. 94).
Thus, the parties shall notify the Court whether they feel further settlement conference would be
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of
service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good
faith, that settlement is likely in this case and whether further settlement conference would be
beneficial. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Judge Ishii’s order of
April 4, 2017, (Doc. 94), with service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 19, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Sheila K. Oberto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?