Bussiere v. Kokor et al
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration and Directing Clerk's Office to Send Plaintiff Copy of Docket signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 01/29/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND DIRECTING
CLERK’S OFFICE TO SEND PLAINTIFF
COPY OF DOCKET
DR. W. KOKOR, et al.,
14
Case No. 1:13-cv-01565-SKO (PC)
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
(Doc. 18)
15
16
Plaintiff Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 27, 2013. On January 28, 2015,
18 Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to submit exhibits and
19 striking the attached exhibits, on the ground that he did not file the motion and he is aware he may
20 not separately submit exhibits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60; Local Rule 230(j).
21
On June 2, 2014, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, served by mail on May 28, 2014;
22 and on June 16, 2014, Plaintiff filed the motion to submit exhibits, served by mail on June 10,
23 2014. Although Plaintiff denies filing the motion to submit exhibits, it was signed and filed by
24 Plaintiff on the dates set forth in the preceding sentence. Accordingly, no ground is presented to
25 relieve Plaintiff from the order denying the motion and striking the exhibits, and his motion for
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1 reconsideration filed on January 28, 2015, is HEREBY ORDERED DENIED. As a courtesy, the
2 Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of the docket.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?