Bussiere v. Kokor et al
Filing
82
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Responsive Brief Deadline: January 11, 2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/16/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
v.
DR. W. KOKOR, et al.,
Case No. 1:13-cv-01565-AWI-SKO (PC)
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE
AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR
OPPOSING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 73)
Defendants.
RESPONSIVE BRIEF DEADLINE:
JANUARY 11, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on claims under the Eight Amendment for deliberate indifference to
Plaintiff's serious medical need. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on July 29,
2016, on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 73.) On December 14, 2016, the Court entered an
order directing the parties to file additional briefing, including documentary evidence, addressing
certain issues. (Doc. 81.) In that order, the Court stated that Plaintiff may file his responsive
brief no later than January 11, 2016. (Id. at 2.)
Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), cert denied --- U.S. ---, 135
S.Ct. 228 (2014), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849
F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the rights and requirements for
25
opposing the motion.
26
1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed in accordance
27
with Local Rule 230(l).
28
1
1
2. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff=s
2
claims in favor of Defendants without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendants= motion sets forth
3
the facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to
4
judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the Statement of Undisputed
5
Facts. Local Rule 260(a).
6
Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion,
7
Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in Defendants=
8
motion but argue that Defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
9
In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in Defendants= motion,
10
Plaintiff may show that Defendants= facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: (1)
11
Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint or the
12
opposition if (a) the complaint or opposition shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the
13
matters stated and (b) Plaintiff calls to the Court=s attention those parts of the complaint or
14
opposition upon which Plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth
15
the facts which Plaintiff believes prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but
16
Plaintiff must prove that the records are what he claims they are; 2 or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon
17
all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or
18
admissions obtained in this proceeding. Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendants= motion
19
with declarations or other evidence, Defendants= evidence will be taken as truth, and final
20
judgment may be entered without a full trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
Similarly, Plaintiff may rely on these materials in addressing the issues raised by the Court
21
22
in its December 14, 2016 order. (See Doc. 81.)
23
In opposing Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b) requires
24
Plaintiff to reproduce Defendants' itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit
25
1
26
27
28
A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) which are based on
the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement is
competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. ' 1746; Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(4). A declaration must be dated and signed under
penalty of perjury as follows: AI declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1746.
2
Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).
2
1
those facts which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If Plaintiff disputes (denies)
2
a fact, Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that denial (e.g., pleading, declaration,
3
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document). Local Rule 260(b).
4
4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is not yet
5
able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will consider a request to
6
postpone consideration of Defendants' motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Any request to postpone
7
consideration of Defendants' motion for summary judgment must include the following: (1) a
8
declaration setting forth the specific facts Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a
9
showing that the facts exist, and (3) a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion
10
for summary judgment. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009);
11
Tatum v. City and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of
12
California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the motion
13
for summary judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would preclude
14
summary judgment. Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1100-01; Margolis v.
15
Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b).
5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of
16
17
perjury have no evidentiary value.
6.
18
The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil
19
Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of
20
sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action.
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 16, 2016
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
3
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?