Bussiere v. Kokor et al
ORDER requiring parties to notify Court whether a Settlement Conference would be beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2017. ( Filing Deadline: 5/1/2017). (Lundstrom, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY
COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL
KOKOR, et al.,
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dispositive motions have been filed
and were recently ruled on. Plaintiff proceeds forward only on his claim against Defendant PA
Tiggs-Brown for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth
Amendment. (See Docs. 14, 90, 94.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this
action will be set for trial.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of
service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good
faith, that settlement is a possibility and whether a settlement conference would be beneficial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 5, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Sheila K. Oberto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?