Bussiere v. Kokor et al

Filing 95

ORDER requiring parties to notify Court whether a Settlement Conference would be beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2017. ( Filing Deadline: 5/1/2017). (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

1:13-cv-01565-AWI-SKO (PC)

ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,

8

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY
COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL

Plaintiff,

9

v.

10

KOKOR, et al.,

11

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

14

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dispositive motions have been filed

15

and were recently ruled on. Plaintiff proceeds forward only on his claim against Defendant PA

16

Tiggs-Brown for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth

17

Amendment. (See Docs. 14, 90, 94.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this

18

action will be set for trial.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of

19
20

service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good

21

faith, that settlement is a possibility and whether a settlement conference would be beneficial.

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24

Dated:

April 5, 2017

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

Sheila K. Oberto

1

.