Bussiere v. Kokor et al

Filing 95

ORDER requiring parties to notify Court whether a Settlement Conference would be beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2017. ( Filing Deadline: 5/1/2017). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 1:13-cv-01565-AWI-SKO (PC) ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE, 8 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 KOKOR, et al., 11 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, Arthur T. Bussiere, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 14 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Dispositive motions have been filed 15 and were recently ruled on. Plaintiff proceeds forward only on his claim against Defendant PA 16 Tiggs-Brown for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth 17 Amendment. (See Docs. 14, 90, 94.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this 18 action will be set for trial. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of 19 20 service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good 21 faith, that settlement is a possibility and whether a settlement conference would be beneficial. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: April 5, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 Sheila K. Oberto 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?