Griffin v. Johnson et al

Filing 101

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Second Motion to Set the Conditions Upon Which Depositions are Conducted at the Prison 99 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/20/16. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN, Case No. 1:13-CV-01599-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO SET THE CONDITIONS UPON WHICH DEPOSITIONS ARE CONDUCTED AT THE PRISON Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 A. JOHNSON, et al., (ECF No. 99) Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Matthew James Griffin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the 21 Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to set the conditions upon which depositions are conducted at 22 the prison, filed September 19, 2016. (ECF No. 99.) The Court issued an order on September 12, 2016, denying Plaintiff’s previous motion to 23 24 set deposition conditions at the prison. (ECF No. 95.) That order and this current motion may 25 have crossed in the mail. The current motion is duplicative of the prior motion; therefore, for the 26 reasons explained in the Court’s September 12, 2016 order, this second motion is also denied. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s second motion to set the 2 conditions upon which depositions are conducted at the prison, filed September 19, 2016 (ECF 3 No. 99) is DENIED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara September 20, 2016 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?