Griffin v. Johnson et al
Filing
101
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Second Motion to Set the Conditions Upon Which Depositions are Conducted at the Prison 99 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/20/16. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN,
Case No. 1:13-CV-01599-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
MOTION TO SET THE CONDITIONS
UPON WHICH DEPOSITIONS ARE
CONDUCTED AT THE PRISON
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
A. JOHNSON, et al.,
(ECF No. 99)
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff Matthew James Griffin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19
20
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the
21
Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to set the conditions upon which depositions are conducted at
22
the prison, filed September 19, 2016. (ECF No. 99.)
The Court issued an order on September 12, 2016, denying Plaintiff’s previous motion to
23
24
set deposition conditions at the prison. (ECF No. 95.) That order and this current motion may
25
have crossed in the mail. The current motion is duplicative of the prior motion; therefore, for the
26
reasons explained in the Court’s September 12, 2016 order, this second motion is also denied.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s second motion to set the
2
conditions upon which depositions are conducted at the prison, filed September 19, 2016 (ECF
3
No. 99) is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
September 20, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?