Griffin v. Johnson et al

Filing 174

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/2/2017. (Settlement Conference (Video Conference)set for 11/14/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, in Sacramento, CA) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01599-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
A. JOHNSON, et al.,

15

Date: November 14, 2017
Time: 9:30 a.m.

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Matthew James Griffin is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that

19

this case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to

20

Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District

21

Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #24 on November 14, 2017 at

22

9:30 a.m.

23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K.

25

Delaney on November 14, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #24 at the U. S. District

26

Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

27
28

2. Plaintiff is to appear at the settlement conference by video conference from his present
place of confinement.
1

1

3. Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the

2

Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The

3

individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and

4

authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose

5

behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the

6

parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. An

7

authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to

8

comply with the requirement of full authority to settle1.

9

4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than

10

November 7, 2017. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement statement Attn:

11

Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200,

12

Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no later than November 7, 2017. The

13

envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

14

STATEMENT.” Defendant shall send the statement to [e-mail].

15

Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement

16

Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

17

5. Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

18

any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with

19

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1 While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d
1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in
mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals
attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat
Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6
F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered
discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker
Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l.,
Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with
full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face
conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum
certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s
Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).

2

1

6. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

2

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

3

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

4

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

5

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of

6

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in

7

dispute.

8

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

9

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
trial.

10
11

e. The relief sought.

12

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.

13

g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement

14

conference.

15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

October 2, 2017

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3