Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents Or Mr. President Of The United States Barack Obama

Filing 3

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Complaint With Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/9/2013, referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

YOUNG YIL JO,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01605-LJO-SAB (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
[ECF No. 1]

Plaintiff Young Yil Jo is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

18

1983, filed on October 7, 2013. Plaintiff is currently in the custody of the Etowah County Jail in

19

Gadsden, Alabama.

20

I.

21

DISCUSSION

22

To date, Plaintiff Young Yil Jo has filed over one-hundred fifty civil cases in this district. The

23

complaint filed in this action is not signed and it sets forth no intelligible claims for relief, and fails to

24

state any cognizable claims under federal law. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-668 (2009); Bell

25

Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Given this litigant’s abusive filing practices in

26

this district, and the utterly incoherent pleading before the Court, leave to amend is not warranted.

27

Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). Federal courts, as all courts, are for the serious

28
1

1

presentation of cases in which litigants wish to have their matters heard. Plaintiff is not one who takes

2

this claim with any serious indication that he intends to pursue a righteous claim.
As for dismissing this case with prejudice, this Plaintiff has filed over one hundred and fifty

3
4

civil cases in this district and in a variety of names involving the similar claims and similar lack of any

5

facts which comport with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has been admonished by

6

numerous judges of this court and yet still heeds no warning. This Court’s previous case involving

7

Plaintiff warned him that the filing of frivolous claims with no basis in law or fact may result in

8

monetary sanctions. (1:13-cv-00750-AWI-SAB, ECF No. 2.) The Court will issue a separate

9

sanctioning order in addition to dismissing Plaintiff’s claim with prejudice.

10

II.

11

RECOMMENDATION

12

Accordingly,

13

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

14

This Findings and Recommendation is submitted to the assigned United States District Court

15

Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of

16

Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Within fourteen (14) days

17

after being served with a copy, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on

18

all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

19

Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may

20

waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.

21

1991)

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated:

October 9, 2013

_

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
2