Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents Or Mr. President Of The United States Barack Obama

Filing 3

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Complaint With Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/9/2013, referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YOUNG YIL JO, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-01605-LJO-SAB (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE [ECF No. 1] Plaintiff Young Yil Jo is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983, filed on October 7, 2013. Plaintiff is currently in the custody of the Etowah County Jail in 19 Gadsden, Alabama. 20 I. 21 DISCUSSION 22 To date, Plaintiff Young Yil Jo has filed over one-hundred fifty civil cases in this district. The 23 complaint filed in this action is not signed and it sets forth no intelligible claims for relief, and fails to 24 state any cognizable claims under federal law. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-668 (2009); Bell 25 Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). Given this litigant’s abusive filing practices in 26 this district, and the utterly incoherent pleading before the Court, leave to amend is not warranted. 27 Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). Federal courts, as all courts, are for the serious 28 1 1 presentation of cases in which litigants wish to have their matters heard. Plaintiff is not one who takes 2 this claim with any serious indication that he intends to pursue a righteous claim. As for dismissing this case with prejudice, this Plaintiff has filed over one hundred and fifty 3 4 civil cases in this district and in a variety of names involving the similar claims and similar lack of any 5 facts which comport with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has been admonished by 6 numerous judges of this court and yet still heeds no warning. This Court’s previous case involving 7 Plaintiff warned him that the filing of frivolous claims with no basis in law or fact may result in 8 monetary sanctions. (1:13-cv-00750-AWI-SAB, ECF No. 2.) The Court will issue a separate 9 sanctioning order in addition to dismissing Plaintiff’s claim with prejudice. 10 II. 11 RECOMMENDATION 12 Accordingly, 13 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 14 This Findings and Recommendation is submitted to the assigned United States District Court 15 Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of 16 Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Within fourteen (14) days 17 after being served with a copy, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on 18 all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 19 Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 20 waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 21 1991) 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: October 9, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?