Ahdom v. Etchebehere et al

Filing 40

ORDER setting Settlement Conference before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on November 4, 2016 at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (start time to be determined at a future date) signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/25/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

BILAL AHDOM,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 1:13-cv-01623-RRB
Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

C. ETCHEBEHERE, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

19

§ 1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference.

20

Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone to conduct a settlement

21

conference at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, 900 Quebec Avenue, Corcoran,

22

California 93212 on November 4, 2016.

23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone

25

on November 4, 2016 at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, 900 Quebec

26

Avenue, Corcoran, California 93212. The start time for the settlement conference will

27

be determined at a future date.

28

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
1

1
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1

2
3

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.

4

The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in

5

person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not

6

proceed and will be reset to another date.

7

4. Each party shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email

8

address: [e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement

9

statement to Sujean Park, ADR & Pro Bono Program Director, USDC CAED, 501 I

10

Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. The envelope shall be marked

11

“Confidential Settlement Statement”. Settlement statements shall arrive no later than

12

November 1, 2016. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential

13

Settlement Conference Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)).

14
15

Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

16

any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked Aconfidential@ with

17

the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.

18
19

The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length,

20

typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

21

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

22
1

23
24
25
26
27
28

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to
order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences… .” United States
v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir.
2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The
term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to
fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G.
Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official
Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also
have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v.
Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D.
at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the
requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).

2

1
2

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds

3

upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties=

4

likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the

5

major issues in dispute.

6

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

7

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial,

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

and trial.
e. The relief sought.
f. The party=s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
g. A brief statement of each party=s expectations and goals for the settlement
conference.
5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation

15

Coordinator at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, via facsimile at (559)

16

992-7191.

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2016

20
21
22

S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
3