Ahdom v. Etchebehere et al

Filing 60

ORDER vacating 49 Motions in Limine from Court's Calendar signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/5/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 BILAL AHDOM, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, vs. 1:13-cv-01623-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER VACATING MOTIONS IN LIMINE FROM COURT’S CALENDAR (ECF No. 49.) C. ETCHEBEHERE, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Bilal Ahdom (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 13 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2017, pursuant to the court’s July 8, 14 2016, Scheduling and Planning Order,1 Defendant Etchebehere filed motions in limine. (ECF 15 No. 49.) 16 As a rule, the parties’ motions in limine are not considered until the case is scheduled 17 for trial. Presently, this case has not been scheduled for trial. In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), 18 the Civil Justice Reform Act, the hearing on the motions and the motions in limine themselves 19 are HEREBY DEEMED VACATED from the court’s calendar until such time as this case is 20 scheduled for trial. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 5, 2017 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 1 28 At the time the Scheduling and Planning Order was issued, this case was assigned to District Judge Ralph R. Beistline. (ECF No. 36.) On December 16, 2016, the case was reassigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (ECF No. 43.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?