Ahdom v. Etchebehere et al

Filing 9

ORDER Adopting 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/20/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILAL AHDOM, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. C. ETCHEBEHERE, et al., Defendants. 1:13-cv-01623-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 3.) ______________________________/ 17 18 Bilal Ahdom (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 11, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 22 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was provided 23 an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendation within twenty days. To 24 date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and 25 recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 27 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 Court finds the findings and recommendation to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The Findings and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 11, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 9, 2013, is DENIED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: November 20, 2013 9 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?