Ahdom v. Etchebehere et al
Filing
9
ORDER Adopting 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/20/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BILAL AHDOM,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
C. ETCHEBEHERE, et al.,
Defendants.
1:13-cv-01623-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
(Doc. 8.)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. 3.)
______________________________/
17
18
Bilal Ahdom (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On October 11, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
22
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was provided
23
an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendation within twenty days. To
24
date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and
25
recommendations.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
27
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
28
Court finds the findings and recommendation to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
4
5
The Findings and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on October
11, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 9, 2013, is
DENIED.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: November 20, 2013
9
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?