Hernandez v. Hernandez et al

Filing 23

ORDER Granting 20 Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/02/2014. Response due by 7/16/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FEDERICO HERNANEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 CASE NO. 1:13-cv-1625-MJS (PC) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT v. M. HERNANDEZ, et al., 15 (ECF NO. 20) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter proceeds against Defendants Hernandez, Zambrano, Rodriguez, Clark, and Martin on Plaintiff’s 20 21 22 claim of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (ECF No. 16.) 23 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to extend the time to respond to 24 Plaintiff’s complaint by 45 days, to and including July 16, 2014. (ECF No. 20.) The 25 motion is based on defense counsel’s declaration that she has requested, but not 26 27 28 received, documents from the Inmate Appeals Board and California Victim 1 Compensation and Government Appeals Board, and they are necessary to respond to 2 Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 3 4 The Court finds good cause for extending the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to 5 6 extend the time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED, and the 7 time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading is extended to and including July 16, 8 2014. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: July 2, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?