Diaz v. Sherman et al
Filing
54
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee Within Twenty-One (21) Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/2017. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:13-cv-01627-DAD-MJS
v.
STU SHERMAN et al.,
15
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
FILING FEE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21)
DAYS
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to
18
19
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 5, 2016, this court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and
22
recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis
23
status pursuant to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be granted, and further
24
directed plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within twenty-one days of the date of the court’s
25
order. (Doc. No. 46.) On August 17, 2016, plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal of the court’s
26
order. (Doc. Nos. 47–48.) On May 22, 2017, the Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff’s appeal due
27
to his failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 53.)
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to pay the required $400 filing fee in full within twenty-
2
one days of the date of service of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of his
3
action.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
May 24, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?