Diaz v. Sherman et al

Filing 54

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee Within Twenty-One (21) Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:13-cv-01627-DAD-MJS v. STU SHERMAN et al., 15 Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 18 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On August 5, 2016, this court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and 22 recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis 23 status pursuant to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be granted, and further 24 directed plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within twenty-one days of the date of the court’s 25 order. (Doc. No. 46.) On August 17, 2016, plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal of the court’s 26 order. (Doc. Nos. 47–48.) On May 22, 2017, the Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff’s appeal due 27 to his failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 53.) 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to pay the required $400 filing fee in full within twenty- 2 one days of the date of service of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of his 3 action. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: May 24, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?