Savala v. Mims et al

Filing 7

ORDER DENYING 6 Change of Address to Street Address; ORDER for Plaintiff to File Notice of Change of Address Within Thirty (30) Days; and ORDER Directing Clerk to Mail Change of Address Form and Copy of This Order to Plaintiff at Two Addresses signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/24/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD J. SAVALA, SR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. MARGARET MIMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 1:13-cv-01632-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO STREET ADDRESS (Doc. 6.) ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MAIL CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM AND COPY OF THIS ORDER TO PLAINTIFF AT TWO ADDRESSES 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Richard J. Savala, Sr. ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on October 23 10, 2013. (Doc. 1.) 24 On October 21, 2013, Plaintiff filed a notice requesting the court to change his address 25 of record to: In care of Kenneth L. Savala, 7092 N. Farris Ave., Pinedale, CA 93650. (Doc. 6.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 II. CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO ADDRESS OTHER THAN PRO SE LITIGANT=S ACTUAL ADDRESS 2 In the event that Plaintiff intends to retain his in propria persona status and continue 3 representing himself, he may not change his address of record at the court to someone else=s 4 address. There is no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure or Local Rule allowing service of court 5 and other legal documents at an address other than a pro se litigant=s actual address. Local Rule 6 131, Local Rule 182(f), and Local Rule 183(b) require pro se litigants to inform the court of 7 their addresses and to keep the court informed of any change in their addresses. There is no 8 authority for the proposition that a pro se litigant can simply request the court to serve him at a 9 different address. 10 There may be special circumstances in which the court could serve a pro se litigant at a 11 separate address. However, no such special circumstances are apparent here. Moreover, 12 service at a location other than Plaintiff=s place of residence can pose significant problems with 13 ensuring that Plaintiff receives all court documentation, meets court deadlines and prepares and 14 signs all of his own legal documentation as a party proceeding in pro se. 15 The court’s current address of record for Plaintiff is: Fresno County Jail, P.O. Box 872, 16 1225 M Street, Fresno, CA 93712. (Court Record.) There is no evidence that Plaintiff was 17 released from custody of the Fresno County Jail. 18 The Clerk of Court shall be directed to send Plaintiff a change-of-address form. 19 Plaintiff is required to complete and return the form to the court within thirty days, notifying 20 the court of his address of actual residence. Plaintiff is cautioned that pro se litigants are 21 required to notify the Clerk and all other parties of any change of address, and absent such 22 notice, service of documents at the prior address of the party shall be fully effective. See Local 23 Rule 182(f). Moreover, Plaintiff=s failure to comply with an order or any Local Rule may be 24 grounds for dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 110. 25 III. CONCLUSION 26 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 Plaintiff=s request to change his address of record at the court to a street address, in care of another individual, is DENIED; 2 1 2. 2 The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order and a change-of-address form to Plaintiff at both of the following addresses: 3 (1) Richard J. Savala, Sr. 1838386 Fresno County Jail P.O. Box 872 1225 M Street Fresno, CA 93712 (2) Richard J. Savala, Sr. In care of Kenneth L. Savala 7092 N. Farris Ave. Pinedale, CA 93650 4 5 6 7 8 9 3. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is required to file 10 a notice of change of address, notifying the court of his address of actual 11 residence; and 12 4. 13 Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 Dated: October 24, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 6i0kij8d 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?