Weeks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
172
ORDER VACATING MARCH 7, 2018 HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/27/2018. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
TREVOR WEEKS,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1641 AWI JLT
Plaintiff
ORDER VACATING MARCH 7, 2018
HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,
Defendant
15
16
17
18
On February 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed an ex parte request to strike two attorneys’ liens filed
by two of his former counsel. See Doc. No. 166.
19
On February 13, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request, but did grant Plaintiff
20
permission (as alternatively requested) to file a formal motion to strike the lien notices. See Doc.
21
No. 168. The Court set a briefing schedule, but did not set a hearing date. See id.
22
23
24
On February 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed a formal motion to strike the liens and set a hearing
on the motion for March 7, 2018. See Doc. No. 169.
On February 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed an amended motion to strike. See Doc. No. 170. The
25
amended motion is significantly different from the original motion. Given the substantial new
26
arguments raised in the amended motion, the Court will accept the amended motion, alter the
27
briefing schedule, and vacate the March 7 hearing.
28
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
Former counsel Parnell Fox and David Doyle may file an opposition to Plaintiff’s amended
motion to strike on or by March 5, 2018;
4
2.
Plaintiff may file a reply on or by 3:00 p.m. on March 9, 2018; and
5
3.
The March 7, 2018 hearing date is VACATED.1
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 27, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
If, after reviewing the papers, the Court determines that a hearing would be helpful, the Court at that time will set a
hearing date.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?