White v. Ecolab Inc
ORDER Extending Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests re 29 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/30/2015. (Martinez, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ECOLAB INC. and DOES 1-25,
Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
Based on the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 29), the Court grants Ecolab Inc. an extension of time to
respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Specifically, Defendant shall respond and/or object to Plaintiff’s
Requests for Admissions, Set One; Interrogatories, Set One; and Requests for Production, Set One on or
before February 11, 2015. The Court notes (and the stipulation acknowledges) that this request is the
second time the parties have requested an extension of time with respect to these discovery requests. The
parties are advised that the Court views the filing of multiple piecemeal requests for extensions of time
with disfavor. In the future, the parties should determine the total amount of time that will actually be
required as an extension before approaching the Court with a stipulated request for an extension of time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 30, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
White v. Ecolab Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?