White v. Ecolab Inc

Filing 31

ORDER Extending Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests re 29 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/30/2015. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 JOHNEY WHITE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. ECOLAB INC. and DOES 1-25, 13 Defendants. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS (Doc. 29) 16 Based on the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 29), the Court grants Ecolab Inc. an extension of time to 17 respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Specifically, Defendant shall respond and/or object to Plaintiff’s 18 Requests for Admissions, Set One; Interrogatories, Set One; and Requests for Production, Set One on or 19 before February 11, 2015. The Court notes (and the stipulation acknowledges) that this request is the 20 21 22 23 second time the parties have requested an extension of time with respect to these discovery requests. The parties are advised that the Court views the filing of multiple piecemeal requests for extensions of time with disfavor. In the future, the parties should determine the total amount of time that will actually be required as an extension before approaching the Court with a stipulated request for an extension of time. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: January 30, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 10922723 1 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE White v. Ecolab Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?