White v. Ecolab Inc

Filing 31

ORDER Extending Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests re 29 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/30/2015. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

FRESNO DIVISION

8
9

JOHNEY WHITE,

10
Plaintiff,
11
12

vs.
ECOLAB INC. and DOES 1-25,

13
Defendants.
14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
DISCOVERY REQUESTS
(Doc. 29)

16
Based on the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 29), the Court grants Ecolab Inc. an extension of time to

17

respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Specifically, Defendant shall respond and/or object to Plaintiff’s
18
Requests for Admissions, Set One; Interrogatories, Set One; and Requests for Production, Set One on or
19
before February 11, 2015. The Court notes (and the stipulation acknowledges) that this request is the
20
21
22
23

second time the parties have requested an extension of time with respect to these discovery requests. The
parties are advised that the Court views the filing of multiple piecemeal requests for extensions of time
with disfavor. In the future, the parties should determine the total amount of time that will actually be
required as an extension before approaching the Court with a stipulated request for an extension of time.

24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27

Dated:

January 30, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
10922723

1
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
White v. Ecolab Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA