Isch et al v. Qualitest Products, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/10/2014.(Case Management Deadline: 4/18/2014) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 SARAH SHAPIRO ISCH, et al., 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. CASE NO. CV F 13-1644 LJO SKO ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 9.) 16 17 QUALITEST PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiffs' counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 18, 2014, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. No good cause is apparent to warrant 60 days to complete settlement and dismiss this action. This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, which are subject to immediate resetting. Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on 28 1 1 counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. This 2 Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil 3 Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court 4 deems appropriate. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill March 10, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?