Isch et al v. Qualitest Products, Inc. et al
Filing
11
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/10/2014.(Case Management Deadline: 4/18/2014) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
SARAH SHAPIRO ISCH, et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
CASE NO. CV F 13-1644 LJO SKO
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 9.)
16
17
QUALITEST PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiffs' counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties.
Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 18,
2014, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good
cause why the action has not been dismissed. No good cause is apparent to warrant 60 days to
complete settlement and dismiss this action.
This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, which are subject to immediate
resetting.
Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on
28
1
1
counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. This
2
Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil
3
Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court
4
deems appropriate.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
March 10, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?