Isch et al v. Qualitest Products, Inc. et al
Filing
13
ORDER Granting Parties' Notice And Stipulation Of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/21/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JOHN K. COURTNEY
State Bar No. 136730
jcourtney@girardikeese.com
GIRARDI | KEESE
1126 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 977-0211
Facsimile: (213) 481-1554
CAITLIN C. BLANCHE
State Bar No. 254109
caitlin.blanche@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
1 Park Plaza, Twelfth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 623-3526
Facsimile: (949) 623-4463
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SARAH SHAPIRO ISCH AND JACOB ISCH
Attorneys for Defendant CVS PHARMACY, INC.
PAMELA J. YATES
State Bar No. 137440
pyates@kayescholer.com
ALICIA CLOUGH
State Bar No. 260012
alicia.clough@kayescholer.com
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 788-1000
Facsimile: (310) 788-1200
Attorneys for Defendants
VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC D/B/A
QUALITEST PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO
PHARMACEUTICALS INC., ENDO HEALTH
SOLUTIONS INC. (F/K/A ENDO
PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS INC.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19 SARAH SHAPIRO ISCH and JACOB
20
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
NOTICE AND STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)
Plaintiffs,
21
22
Case No. 1:13-CV-01644-LJO-SKO
ISCH,
v.
QUALITEST PRODUCTS, INC.; BRENN
23 DISTRIBUTION, INC.; ENDO
Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
Magistrate Hon. Sheila K. Oberto
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; ENDO
24 PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS,
INC.; ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS,
25 INC.; CVS PHARMACY, INC.; DOES 1 10, inclusive,
26
27
Defendants.
28
1
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
The Court having considered the parties’ Notice and Stipulation of Dismissal with
2 Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and finding good cause
3 therefore;
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned action is dismissed in its
5 entirety with prejudice.
6
7
8
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
April 21, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?